Publications


Sponsored
  • Over the past two decades, neurosurgery has been transformed by technological advancements, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a deeper understanding of the brain
  • Breakthroughs like functional magnetic resonance imaging and minimally invasive surgery have enhanced diagnostics and treatments, steering the field away from its conventional practices 
  • By 2040, such changes will continue and accelerate as neurosurgery embraces augmented reality interfaces, robotics, and artificial intelligence, facilitating personalised interventions based on individual genetic profiles
  • The future of neurosurgery will not only showcase technological excellence but also a heightened commitment to ethical principles prioritising patient welfare and societal wellbeing
 
Neurosurgery 2040
 
Over the past two decades, neurosurgery has undergone a transformation, marked by increased precision, less invasive procedures, and swifter recovery, all driven by technological advances, interdisciplinary collaboration, and an enhanced comprehension of the brain. Progress ranges from neuroimaging technologies to refined surgical techniques. This Commentary briefly describes the milestones and ethical considerations of neurosurgery up to ~2040.
 
Since 2000, the convergence of technologies such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and minimally invasive surgery has improved diagnostic approaches and treatment methodologies. Departing from conventional norms, the advent of personalised medicine and the rise of neurostimulation hold the promise of advancing our comprehension and treatment of neurological disorders.
 
Looking forward to ~2040, we foresee these trends intensifying, with operating rooms (OR) equipped with state-of-the-art technologies like augmented reality interfaces, robotics, and artificial intelligence (AI), synergising with human expertise. Envisage progress in targeted medicine to also continue and further disrupt neurosurgical treatments by customising interventions according to individuals' distinctive genetic profiles and incorporating developments in gene therapies. As these technologies augment cognitive capabilities, addressing ethical concerns to increase in importance will become more relevant. Prioritising moral considerations will be essential to ensure responsible and compassionate utilisation of these tools.
 
Furthermore, the upcoming collaboration spanning various fields is positioned to speed up, playing a crucial role in driving neurosurgery to unprecedented levels. This cooperative endeavour is expected to break down traditional barriers and enhance our understanding of the complexities of the brain. Looking forward to 2040, an intensified sense of purpose among healthcare providers is predicted, highlighted by heightened global awareness and strategic initiatives aimed at reducing healthcare disparities by broadening access to neurosurgical expertise worldwide. Underscoring the increasing significance of robust ethical guidelines and ongoing dialogues, we highlight the importance of steering the path of neurosurgery beyond technical innovations. Contemplate a growing focus on ethical principles that prioritise patient welfare and societal wellbeing, indicating that the future of neurosurgery will be characterised by a blend of technological expertise and a more pronounced commitment to human values and purpose.
  
In this Commentary

This Commentary has two parts. Its overall aim is to nudge neurosurgeons and providers to reflect on their current modus operandi and strategically prepare for the future. Part 1, Neurosurgery since 2000, briefly describes technological developments and interdisciplinary collaboration, which have improved diagnostics, treatments, and our understanding of the complexities of the brain. Part 2, Neurosurgery 2040, anticipates integrated operating rooms where augmented reality, robotics, and AI merge with human expertise. This forward-looking approach stresses interdisciplinary collaboration and a purpose-driven mindset to enhance access to efficacious therapies.
 
Part 1
Neurosurgery since 2000
 
Over the past two decades, neurosurgery has evolved at a pace unparalleled in its history. From advancements that have improved diagnosis to the refinement of surgical techniques, the field, since the turn of the millennium, has been a testament to the determined pursuit of knowledge and the inventive spirit within the medical community. We briefly describe aspects of this transformative journey, shedding light on a few key milestones, ethical considerations, and the promising trajectory that lies ahead.
 
Technologies such as fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and positron emission tomography (PET) have become essential tools to improve diagnostics. Concurrently, minimally invasive surgical approaches, guided by real-time imaging, have not only reduced invasiveness but have also improved patient outcomes. The collaboration between advanced neuroimaging and refined surgical methods marks a shift in neurological care, by facilitating more precise and effective interventions. Indeed, a hallmark of neurosurgery's evolution since 2000 has been the increased use of precision medicine. Departing from the traditional one-size-fits-all approach, the field has shifted towards tailoring treatments based on individual genetic, molecular, and physiological characteristics. Genetic profiling, biomarker identification, and targeted therapies have emerged as effective tools to enhance diagnostic accuracy and pave the way for the expansion of personalised therapies. This departure from conventional approaches suggests a future where neurosurgical treatments are as unique as the individuals they seek to assist.
 
Empowered by technological progress, surgeons can now probe the brain with newfound precision and safety. Minimally invasive approaches, including endoscopic and stereotactic procedures, have minimised trauma, accelerated recovery times, and expanded the scope of what is surgically achievable. Neuron-navigation systems and robotic-assisted surgeries have further enhanced neurosurgical practice, redefined possibilities, and improved outcomes. The rise of minimally invasive procedures has not only reshaped neurosurgery but has also facilitated patient-friendly approaches over traditional open surgeries. Techniques such as endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures significantly reduce physical tolls on patients, improve recovery times, and minimise complications. Equipped with specialised tools and advanced imaging, neurosurgeons can navigate through the brain's structures with minimal disruption, and not only provide medical advantages but also cosmetic benefits and faster postoperative rehabilitation.
Since 2000, neurostimulation has introduced novel therapeutics for various neurological disorders. Technologies such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have brought relief to conditions such as Parkinson's disease and chronic pain. The integration of adaptive neurostimulation guided by real-time feedback, represents a shift towards personalised and adaptive treatments, offering hope for an improved quality of life.
You might also like:

Brain disorders and the changing nature of neurosurgery
The burgeoning field of neurogenetics investigates the interplay between genes and complex neural networks. Personalised therapies, which have evolved from unravelling unique genetic signatures, hold promise for conditions such as Alzheimer's, Parkinson’s, and epilepsy. Neurogenetics not only carries the potential for targeted interventions but also provides insights into the individuality of our minds, suggesting a new era where the enigmas of cognition are elucidated.
 
Interdisciplinary approaches drive breakthroughs in neurosurgery that go beyond traditional boundaries. The fusion of neuroscience with engineering, computer science, and genetics enhances our understanding of the brain, leading to creative solutions. Whether neurosurgeons collaborate with engineers or data scientists, these partnerships redefine possibilities within the field, pointing towards a future where the complexities of the brain are unravelled through a range of capabilities. Translational research in neurological disorders provides additional hope by linking theoretical breakthroughs to tangible results. The combined efforts of researchers, clinicians, and pharmaceutical experts expedite the development of innovative therapies, bringing optimism to those affected by neurosurgical disorders.
 
Neurosurgical progress brings hope, yet finding a balance between technological development and ethical challenges is essential. While innovations hold promise, the ethical considerations associated with interventions related to the brain, including matters such as informed consent and privacy, become increasingly complex. Thus, it is crucial to reconcile the progress in neurosurgery with an awareness of ethical responsibilities, ensuring the utmost respect for the human mind.

 
Part 2
Neurosurgery 2040
 
Neurosurgery 2040 envisions a future shaped by ongoing developments since 2000, described in Part 1. Though predicting specifics is challenging, key trends are gaining momentum and set to rapidly redefine the field over the next two decades. The integration of AI and novel technologies, collaborative efforts across disciplines, a shift towards patient-focused precision care, improved accessibility to neurosurgical interventions, and a heightened focus on ethical considerations collectively signal the nature of forthcoming transformation. While these trends have been evolving since 2000, it is important to note the accelerated pace at which they are expected. This underscores the need for clinicians and providers to proactively prepare for imminent paradigm shifts. This section offers a partial glimpse into potential aspects of neurosurgery in 2040, emphasising the urgency for adaptation and innovation.
 
In January 2024, Neuralink, founded by Elon Musk in 2016, achieved a significant milestone by successfully implanting its inaugural device into a human patient. This marked progress towards realising Musk's visionary goal of helping individuals grappling with paralysis and diverse neurological conditions. Concurrently, Jaguar Gene Therapy secured FDA approval for its gene therapy designed to address genetic manifestations of autism spectrum disorder and Phelan-McDermid syndrome, instilling hope in thousands of individuals who have lacked effective treatment options.
 
While traumatic brain injury (TBI) continues to be a pervasive global health concern, affecting millions annually, (in the US ~2m cases each year), the resultant annual global burden on healthcare, patients, families, and society amounts to ~US$400bn. The current gold standard management of severe TBI involves an invasive procedure, which entails drilling a hole in the skull to insert a catheter for monitoring intracranial pressure (ICP). However, the evolution of neurosurgical techniques suggests that this invasive process will become obsolete by 2040. Emerging innovations are poised to replace it with a non-invasive method for monitoring ICP.
You might also like:

Healthcare 2040

Such breakthroughs provide a glimpse into the future landscape of neuro-trauma and neuro-disorders expected by 2040, highlighting the rapid pace of progress in the field. It seems plausible to posit that, as neurosurgery undergoes these, and other, changes, clinicians and healthcare providers will witness a paradigm shift, fostering an evolution in patient outcomes and reshaping neurological care.
Expect the continued development and increasing adoption of minimally invasive techniques, neuroimaging, nanotechnology, and targeted therapies. These advancements are poised to replace standard surgical approaches in neurosurgery, leading to a significant improvement in the overall patient experience and making interventions more accessible. The future of neurosurgery envisions the use of microscopic robotics for intricate procedures, steering away from invasive surgeries and embracing non-invasive alternatives. AI techniques are set to play a crucial role, serving as co-pilots by analysing real-time data. Additionally, genetic insights will inform tailored interventions in this collaborative environment, blurring interdisciplinary boundaries and signalling a departure from conventional approaches. The focal point of this shift is personalised care.

Within this evolving ecosystem, genetic profiling empowers neurosurgeons to design custom neural implants and gene therapies. This has the potential to significantly reduce the need for invasive procedures. These changes highlight the urgency for adaptation and innovation in the field, underscoring the importance of staying at the forefront of these technological and medical advancements.
 
By 2040, a confluence of neurogenetics, personalised neurosurgical therapies, and genetic engineering is anticipated to surpass conventional medical norms. Novel technologies will unravel the intricate interplay between genetics and neurological disorders, delivering custom-made solutions, significantly reducing risks, and optimising therapeutic outcomes. In the approaching years leading up to 2040, Western providers are positioned to align themselves with a defined 'purpose' and actively participate in initiatives aimed at enhancing access to high-quality healthcare. While these pursuits complement the traditional focus on maximising returns for investors, they are increasingly becoming an intrinsic part of the worldview and demands of Generation Z. The imperative for traditional providers to adopt a purpose-driven ethos and acknowledge their global responsibilities is important, and encouraged by a growing call for greater inclusivity. Foresee a surge in global awareness regarding healthcare disparities, prompting a commitment to leveraging technology for the advancement of worldwide healthcare accessibility. A socially responsible approach, incorporating ethical business practices and community engagement, is not only a moral imperative but is also foreseen to contribute significantly to the enduring sustainability of the MedTech industry.
 
As we approach 2040, Western neurosurgical providers will be expected to adopt a sharper 'ethical' focus, particularly in response to the escalating utilisation of neural implants and genetic therapies. While many MedTechs currently profess ethical awareness, the impending changes in neurosurgery underscore the necessity for a significant revaluation and augmentation of ethical strategies.
 
As neurosurgery advances with the further introduction of disruptive technologies and heightened cognitive capabilities, ethical considerations are projected to take centre stage. Deliberations on fairness, consent, and the definition of "normal" cognitive function converge with the emergence of neuroenhancement techniques and the integration of brain-computer interfaces. Ethical frameworks will be indispensable to mitigate and prevent biases in AI algorithms, address privacy concerns, and ensure the judicious utilisation of genetic information.
 
Effectively navigating these moral complexities demands not only technical innovation but also a robust moral compass to align enhanced cognition with human values. The evolving interplay between ethical considerations and technical progress underscores the imperative for ongoing dialogues among neuroscientists, ethicists, and policymakers. The overall objective is to shape the future of neurosurgery not solely through technological advancements but by integrating ethical principles that prioritise patient welfare and contribute to societal wellbeing.
  
Takeaways
 
We have described the transformative journey that neurosurgery has undertaken over the past two decades and provided a glimpse into its future. From the integration of breakthrough neuroimaging technologies to the emergence of precision medicine, neurosurgery has evolved, promising enhanced diagnostics and personalised therapies.
 
As we cast our gaze forward to 2040, a future unfolds where operating rooms are integrated with augmented reality interfaces, robotics, and AI, working in tandem with human expertise. Precision medicine takes centre stage, tailoring neurosurgical interventions to individual genetic profiles. However, the progress is not without its ethical challenges. The heightened cognitive abilities brought about by innovative technologies demand an appreciation for morality to ensure responsible and compassionate use. We stress the increasing significance of interdisciplinary collaboration, transcending traditional boundaries to foster a deeper understanding of the brain, and suggest a future where medical technology providers embrace a heightened sense of purpose, addressing global healthcare disparities by expanding access to neurosurgical expertise worldwide. Emphasising the critical role of robust ethical frameworks and ongoing dialogues, the Commentary suggests the future of neurosurgery should not only be defined by technical prowess but must also prioritise ethical principles that safeguard patient welfare and societal wellbeing.
 
Overall, the Commentary is a nudge for neurosurgery clinicians and providers to reflect on their current positions and prepare for a different future as the field is developing fast. Our two-part exploration, spanning the past two decades and projecting into Neurosurgery 2040, encourages a forward-looking approach marked by interdisciplinary collaboration and a purpose-driven mindset. The vision presented suggests that the future of neurosurgery will be characterised by a blend of technological expertise and a commitment to human values, ensuring that the field continues to develop ethically and deliver impactful, accessible, and compassionate care to individuals worldwide.
view in full page

Cervical Biopsy Brooklyn NYCThe cervix is the lower part of the uterus that forms a canal that opens into the vagina and leads to outside the body. The tissue that’s removed is then closely examined under a microscope.

A cervical biopsy is normally performed during a colposcopy procedure or Pap Smear biopsy procedure.

Cervical Biopsy What Is a Cervical Biopsy?
A cervical biopsy is a procedure that is performed to remove tissue from the cervix to test for abnormal cells or precancerous conditions.

Cervical Biopsy or Punch Biopsy
The amount of tissue your doctor removes is dependent on the type of GYN biopsy being done. A simple cervical biopsy procedure, also known as a punch biopsy, removes a small piece of tissue from the surface of the cervix, where as an endocervical biopsy (endocervical curettage) removes tissue from high in the cervical canal and requires scraping with a sharp instrument.

Cone Biopsy
Cone biopsy Brooklyn NYCAnother possible GYN biopsy is a cervix cone biopsy or conization where your doctor will use a laser or scalpel to remove a large cone shaped piece of tissue from the cervix.

Lastly, there is the Loop Electrosurgical Excision procedure (LEEP) that uses a thin, low-voltage electrified wire loop to cut out any abnormal tissue found. In addition to removing tissue for testing, some of these procedures can be used to completely remove areas of abnormal tissue and may also be used in the treatment of precancerous lesions.

If you’re undergoing a cervix biopsy procedure that requires a general anesthetic, you’ll need to stop eating at least eight hours before the procedure.

Read more: https://brooklyngynplace.com/cervical-biopsy-obgyn-physicians-downtown-brooklyn-nyc/

Brooklyn GYN Place
142 Joralemon Street, #4CF,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(718) 624-0604

Web Address:
https://www.brooklyngynplace.com/

Our location on the map: https://goo.gl/maps/TdxdKLtq6PuS65ck9

https://plus.codes/87G8M2V4+4H Brooklyn

Nearby Locations:
Downtown Brooklyn | Fort Greene | Boerum Hill | Cobble Hill | Columbia Street Waterfront District
11201| 11205 | 11217 | 11238 | 11231

Working Hours:
Monday - Friday: 9am - 5:30pm
Saturday: 9am - 11:30am
Sunday: Closed

Payment: cash, check, credit cards.

view in full page

What Are Uterine Fibroids?
Uterine fibroids treatment Brooklyn, NYUterine fibroids develop in the womb and are muscular tumors. They are usually benign, and less than one in 1000 will become cancerous. Having fibroids does not increase your risk of developing another form of cancer in the uterus. Fibroids are usually round, and although they consist of the same smooth muscle as the wall of the uterus, they are much denser. Uterine fibroids may develop singly, or you might have multiple tumors. They can be very small or might grow to become grapefruit sized.

Who Gets Uterine Fibroids?
Uterine fibroids generally develop during the 30s, 40s, and through menopause but are most common amongst women in their 40s and early 50s. Genetics is another factor as if your mother or another close female relative had fibroids, your risk is approximately three times higher than average.
Overweight women are at higher risk, especially those who are very heavy. Your ethnicity also makes a difference, as African-American women are more at risk than white women. If you like to eat plenty of red meat and ham, you are more likely to get fibroids compared with a woman who eats lots of green vegetables, which seems to have a protective effect.

Read more: https://brooklyngynplace.com/uterine-fibroids-treatment-brooklyn-heights-nyc/

Brooklyn GYN Place
142 Joralemon Street, #4CF,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(718) 624–0604

Web-address: https://www.brooklyngynplace.com/

Location on the map: https://goo.gl/maps/TdxdKLtq6PuS65ck9

https://plus.codes/87G8M2V4+4H Brooklyn

Nearby Locations:
Downtown Brooklyn | Fort Greene | Boerum Hill | Cobble Hill | Columbia Street Waterfront District
11201| 11205 | 11217 | 11238 | 11231

Working Hours:
Monday — Friday: 9am — 5:30pm
Saturday: 9am — 11:30am
Sunday: Closed

Payment: cash, check, credit cards.

view in full page
  • Effective MedTech leadership in the next decade requires adept navigation of companies through evolving markets, technological advancements, and simultaneous management of established legacy businesses
  • Historically, MedTech leaders have been drawn from a limited pool, potentially slowing effective adaptation to new technologies, and markets
  • This has allowed tech giants to disrupt the sector, emphasising a shift from the development of physical devices to integrated healthcare solutions
  • The 4th industrial revolution (Industry 4.0) is crucial in facilitating the transformation, breaking down traditional boundaries between medical devices, pharmaceuticals, software, and patient data
  • Executives with experience in service-based sectors adjacent to MedTech may be better equipped to lead, leveraging their tech-centric background to capitalise on digital technologies and big data strategies for successful adaptation and thriving in the evolving healthcare ecosystem
 
Is MedTech Entering a New Era of Leadership and Purpose-Driven Innovation?
 
MedTech leadership is at a crossroads, demanding a strategic overhaul to tackle unprecedented sector changes anticipated over the next decade. Navigating this evolving landscape requires reconciling traditional manufacturing expertise and cutting-edge digital capabilities. A forward-thinking CEO with digital acumen is pivotal for innovation, yet the complexities of manufacturing and stringent regulatory frameworks remain crucial. In response, it seems reasonable to suggest that a collaborative leadership approach would be optimal, pairing a visionary CEO with digital expertise alongside a seasoned COO well-versed in manufacturing and regulatory compliance. This, would not only alleviate the burden on a single leader but also combine the strengths of both domains, fostering a more resilient leadership model. By strategically aligning these skill sets, MedTech companies would be better positioned to adeptly bridge the gap between tradition and digital evolution amid the complexities of an increasingly competitive market.

Historically, MedTech leadership, drawn from a limited pool of individuals, may fall short in ensuring commercial success in the coming decade. The sector's reluctance to swiftly embrace emerging technologies has created an opening for tech giants to disrupt it, mirroring the upheavals witnessed in financial markets.
 To thrive, MedTech companies must shift from developing physical devices to strategically promoting integrated healthcare solutions and services. The 4th Industrial Revolution, (Industry 4.0) plays a pivotal role in this evolution, breaking down traditional boundaries between medical devices, pharmaceuticals, software, and patient data. It reshapes connections among the physical, biological, and digital realms within the healthcare sector, emphasising advanced data and digitalisation strategies.

In this paradigm shift, traditional MedTech executives may find themselves ill-equipped to lead effectively. Executives from adjacent service-based sectors, with a tech-centric background, seem better positioned to spearhead this transformation. Leveraging their expertise, these leaders can adeptly capitalise on digital technologies and utilise big data strategies to navigate and adapt business models. Strategic leadership from executives with a tech-centric background is essential for MedTech companies to survive and thrive in the future.
 
In this Commentary
 
This Commentary has two parts. Part 1: The MedTech Market describes opportunities and challenges within the evolving dynamic global market. Part 2: Navigating MedTech’s Evolutionary Challenges, examines the limitations of current MedTech leadership, suggesting a shift towards diverse skills, backgrounds, and perspectives. Future MedTech leaders need expertise in digital technologies, data analytics, and innovative business models, coupled with an understanding of global markets and a compelling sense of purpose to engage and inspire Generation Zs. Takeaways raise the likelihood that existing MedTech executives may be ill-equipped for upcoming industry transformations, highlighting the potential of leaders from service-based sectors with proven strategic agility and innovation.
 
Part 1
The MedTech Market

Currently, MedTech is undergoing a transformation, and shedding its traditional conservative image. The industry's growth is driven by various factors, such as the aging global population, an uptick in chronic diseases, and an increasing trust in medical devices among clinicians and consumers, which has fostered stronger collaborations between MedTech and pharmaceutical companies. Although the US and the EU continue to be significant contributors to MedTech markets, they face hurdles, including increasingly stringent regulations, shifts in reimbursement policies, and elevated costs linked to advanced medical technologies.
 
About two decades ago, foreseeing constraints, some large MedTechs like Johnson & Johnson (J&J), Abbott, and Medtronic, strategically established manufacturing and research and development (R&D) centres in emerging markets such as Brazil, China, and India. Back then, these markets were undergoing substantial growth, fuelled by burgeoning middle-class populations with an increasing demand for improved healthcare services. This situation not only presented strategic opportunities for continuous expansion but also served as a buffer against the escalating difficulties experienced by MedTechs in the more mature Western markets.
 
Despite facing challenges, the global MedTech market continues to be a promising arena for growth and innovation, extending its reach across diverse sectors and geographies. Projections indicate that its global revenues will reach ~US$610bn in 2024, with an anticipated compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of ~5.2%. This trajectory points towards a substantial market volume of ~US$748bn by 2028. The US stands as the primary revenue contributor, expected to reach ~US$216bn in 2024. Historically, MedTech business models have predominantly targeted affluent markets in the US, Western Europe, and Japan, comprising only ~13% of the world's population but holding a significant market share. This historical skew allowed MedTech leaders to focus their marketing efforts on healthcare providers in prosperous developed regions, benefitting from favourable fee for service reimbursement policies. Notwithstanding, recent years have witnessed a tightening of the wealthy Western markets.
In the coming decade, MedTech sectors in emerging regions are set to experience significant growth. For example, in 2024 China's MedTech revenues are anticipated to realise ~US$46bn, with a projected CAGR to 2028 of ~7.5%. This growth trajectory is expected to culminate in a market volume of ~US$61bn in the near term. In the face of dynamic shifts, MedTech leaders are confronted with the challenge of recalibrating their strategies to ensure sustained success amid challenging global politico-economic conditions and the use of more demanding outcome-based healthcare reimbursement models in traditional wealthy Western markets.


You might also like:

Healthcare 2040


 
Following a peak in late 2021, MedTech stocks faced a setback around mid-2022, losing a significant portion of the gains accumulated during the Covid-19 pandemic. By July 2023, growth had slowed, with MedTech valuations showing only a modest increase of ~22% compared to January 2020. During this period, trading multiples experienced a decline, dropping from a peak of ~16x in September 2021 to ~7x by mid-2023, falling below the industry's 10-year average of ~8x.
 
Although there have been some recent improvements, the 2023 EY, Pulse of the MedTech Industry Report raised concerns about challenges ahead for the sector. In the post-Covid landscape, the industry is grappling with significant hurdles, including a notable decline in public valuations and ~30% decrease in financing. These challenges manifest in various aspects, such as a downturn in special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) deals, a substantial decrease in the total value of initial public offerings (IPOs), and a slump of ~21% in venture capital (VC) funding. Compounding these issues is a decline of ~44% in merger and acquisition (M&A) activity.
 
Traditionally, M&A has played a crucial role for MedTechs, contributing to scale, operational leverage, financial performance, product portfolio diversification, improved therapeutic solutions, and international expansion - all while maintaining core manufacturing structures and strategies. Moreover, post-Covid, revenue growth has experienced a significant dip, dropping from ~16% in 2021 to ~3.5% in 2022, and remaining flat in 2023. The anticipated future growth of ~5% may encounter challenges due to a potential scarcity of new disruptive product offerings. These challenges have implications for equity investment, which hit a seven-year low in 2023, declining by ~27% to ~US$14bn. Notably this impacts smaller, innovation-driven firms.


A positive recent trend is the rapid growth of digital health with expected global revenues set to reach ~US$194bn by 2024, with a projected CAGR of ~9% from 2024 to 2028, which would deliver a market volume of ~US$275bn by 2028. China leads in global revenue generation for digital health, reaching ~US$53bn in 2024. However, many large diversified MedTechs with legacy products in slow-growing markets have yet to capitalise on this trend.
 
MedTech stands at a critical juncture, navigating challenges that necessitate a strategic overhaul for sustained success. The decline in key financial indicators and the sluggish pace of innovation pose significant threats, obliging leaders to embrace transformative strategies and capitalise on emerging trends, particularly in digital health, to secure a resilient future.

 
Part 2
Navigating MedTech’s Evolutionary Challenges

Changes in the MedTech landscape introduce difficulties for executives striving to stay abreast of technological advances and transformative shifts, particularly in emerging economies. Compounding these obstacles is the prevalence of middle-aged men in leadership roles, perpetuating traditional management styles that may impede the necessary adaptations required for growth.

You might also like:

Redefining Leadership In The Evolving Landscape Of MedTech

Despite women constituting >50% of the MedTech workforce and significantly influencing healthcare decisions, they are underrepresented in executive positions. Addressing these disparities is not just a moral obligation but a strategic imperative to unlock the full potential by embracing diverse perspectives and talents. The historical contributions of women in healthcare underscores the urgency of closing the gender gap in MedTech leadership.
Further complicating matters is the median age of C-suite executives; ~56. This demographic nearing retirement, suggests that many company leaders embarked on their professional journeys before the pervasive influence of the Internet, email, and the rise of social media platforms, creating a technological generation gap. The sector's historical reliance on affluent markets in the US and Europe, coupled with fee-for-service healthcare policies, poses challenges in adapting to emerging markets and reimbursement policies centred on patient outcomes.
 
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into medical devices adds another layer of complexity, necessitating a paradigm shift. However, this transformation proves challenging for traditional leaders, given that these impactful changes unfolded during the mature phases of their careers. Notably, out of ~691 FDA-approved algorithms functioning as medical devices, ~35% received clearance in 2022 and 2023. Despite the urgent need for adaptation, persistent leadership obstacles hinder progress, particularly in understanding and aligning with the fluidity of rapidly evolving technologies in new markets.
 
MedTech leaders face challenges in understanding the dynamics of emerging markets, especially in economically vibrant regions like Brazil, India, China, and sizable African nations. These areas experience economic development and a growing middle class, leading to increased demand for advanced healthcare. The global acumen gap is further intensified by a lack of first-hand experience among these professionals in these regions, presenting a hurdle to effective guidance. Consequently, many MedTech executives seem to struggle with delivering impactful direction, given the disconnect with transformative trends in emerging markets and advancing technologies. Addressing these perspective and knowledge gaps requires more than incremental adjustments; it calls for a shift in mindset and a recalibration.
 
Significant changes in MedTech call for a departure from traditional top-down directives towards an empowering leadership style. The sector now demands a new breed of leaders - tech savvy individuals with global experience capable of understanding and connecting with the needs and aspirations of Generation Z employees. This demographic shift in the workforce requires leaders who not only comprehend evolving technologies but also align with the values and expectations of today's highly skilled, young professionals. Beyond the pursuit of shareholder value, this demographic craves purpose-driven leadership and seeks companies with a clear sense of mission and societal impact. In this context, MedTech companies face a stark choice: adapt to lead with purpose or risk being left behind.
 
Takeaways

The future leadership of MedTech companies stands at a critical juncture as it is potentially faced with unprecedented changes over the next decade. While the necessity of a forward-looking CEO with digital acumen is essential for strategic innovation, the persisting challenges of manufacturing and regulatory frameworks highlight the need for a more collaborative leadership approach. To address this, we have proposed a strategic collaboration between a visionary CEO equipped with digital expertise and a seasoned COO skilled in manufacturing and compliance. It seems reasonable to assume that this would not only ease the burden on a single individual but also harness the strengths of both, fostering a more resilient leadership approach. Further, it recognises that navigating change demands a balance between embracing digital evolution and maintaining a strong foundation in traditional manufacturing and regulatory compliance. Future MedTech leaders must be able to bridge knowledge and perspective gaps, align with emerging technologies, and connect with the aspirations of the evolving workforce. The shift towards a more empowering leadership style, coupled with an understanding of Industry 4.0 principles and the dynamics of emerging markets, is essential for sustained success in a rapidly evolving market.

The urgency for MedTech leaders to adopt a forward-thinking, adaptable, and purpose-driven approach cannot be overstressed. The industry's capacity to allure and retain talent, foster innovation, and make substantial contributions to global healthcare pivots on a commitment to purposeful leadership and the incorporation of transformative strategies. In this demanding journey, the judicious collaboration between a forward-looking CEO and a traditional COO emerges as a strategic imperative, ensuring a comprehensive and resilient leadership model that can thrive in the next decade. 
view in full page

Finding an endometriosis specialist is crucial to getting proper treatment for the disease. Important to see a well qualified and well-trained minimally invasive GYN surgical specialist who is board-certified and fellowship-trained. Dr. Marashi is an internationally recognized board-certified expert and renowned specialist in minimally invasive laparoscopic endometriosis surgery.

What Is Endometriosis?
EndometriosisEndometriosis is a disease that affects women, usually between the age of 25 and 40. This disorder is one of the main causes of infertility among women.

It never appears before puberty and always ends at the time of menopause due to a lack of ovarian hormones. The incidence of endometriosis is higher in infertile women, between 25-40 %, while in the general population, endometriosis has an incidence of 3 – 10 %.

Endometriosis is characterized by the growth of uterine tissue outside of the endometrium. This uterine tissue grows inside of the myometrium or even outside of the uterus.

Internal Endometriosis – When the uterine tissue grows inside of the myometrium, it is called Adenomyosis or Internal Endometriosis.

External Endometriosis – When the uterine tissue grows outside of the uterus, it is called External Endometriosis. The uterine tissue can be found almost in every part and organ of the body, but it is more common in the ovaries, peritoneum, rectum, intestine, vagina, vulva, bladder, liver, etc.

Until today the real cause of pelvic endometriosis is not known. However, there are several theories that try to explain it. The most acceptable theories include:

Metaplasic theory
Implantation theory
Metastatic theory
Surgical scar implantation
Immune system disorder

Read more: https://brooklyngynplace.com/endometriosis-obgyn-physicians-downtown-brooklyn-nyc/

 

Brooklyn GYN Place
142 Joralemon Street, #4CF,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(718) 624-0604

Web Address:
https://www.brooklyngynplace.com/

Our location on the map: https://goo.gl/maps/TdxdKLtq6PuS65ck9

https://plus.codes/87G8M2V4+4H Brooklyn

Nearby Locations:
Downtown Brooklyn | Fort Greene | Boerum Hill | Cobble Hill | Columbia Street Waterfront District
11201| 11205 | 11217 | 11238 | 11231

Working Hours:
Monday - Friday: 9am - 5:30pm
Saturday: 9am - 11:30am
Sunday: Closed

Payment: cash, check, credit cards.

 

view in full page

Brooklyn GYN Place offers a discount

Brooklyn GYN Place has over 20 years of experience and offers the full range of OB/GYN procedures. All procedures and exams are performed in a safe and comfortable setting, our fully licensed facility. We serve Brooklyn Heights, Red Hook, Park Slope and Bedford-Stuyvesant areas. We are currently running a limited time event for all new patients. If you’re a first-time patient, make an appointment today and receive 5–10% off.

Brooklyn GYN Place
142 Joralemon Street, #4CF,
Brooklyn, NY 11201
(718) 624–0604

Web-address: https://www.brooklyngynplace.com/

Location on the map: https://goo.gl/maps/TdxdKLtq6PuS65ck9

https://plus.codes/87G8M2V4+4H Brooklyn

Nearby Locations:

Downtown Brooklyn | Fort Greene | Boerum Hill | Cobble Hill | Columbia Street Waterfront District
11201| 11205 | 11217 | 11238 | 11231

Working Hours:
Monday — Friday: 9am — 5:30pm
Saturday: 9am — 11:30am
Sunday: Closed

Payment: cash, check, credit cards.

view in full page
  • Up to ~5% of American and British citizens grapple with narcissism, which is characterised by self-centeredness and a lack of empathy
  • Narcissists disrupt organisations and relationships through hindering collaboration, discouraging teamwork, exploiting others, and displaying an exaggerated sense of self-worth, all while lacking empathy
  • Narcissists are drawn to healthcare for admiration, control and validation, which can pose a threat to the delivery of quality care
  • Narcissism's impact on efficiency and productivity often goes unnoticed by many healthcare leaders, despite the underlying harm it causes
  • Vigilance in identifying and effectively managing narcissistic traits within healthcare settings is necessary to preserve the integrity of patient-centred care and collaboration among healthcare professionals
 
Narcissism: Impeding Healthcare Quality and Organisational Effectiveness
 
 
Abstract

In the landscape of 2024, where the healthcare sector is strained by the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, the challenges faced by healthcare executives are multifaceted. The surge in demand for care, driven by aging and chronically ill populations, collides with a diminishing supply of health professionals, creating a significant imbalance. Amidst this, many healthcare organisations grapple with declining workplace productivity and escalating gross margins. Such issues are further complicated by the struggle of human resource executives to foster collaboration, enhance teamwork, and improve employee satisfaction in the face of weak corporate cultures. A critical and often overlooked aspect contributing to the complexity of healthcare delivery is narcissism: a silent force that permeates the industry. The warning from Rob Behrens, the UK's Parliamentary and NHS ombudsman, sheds light on the impact of narcissistic tendencies among health professionals. The revelation of daily failings linked to narcissism raises concerns, supported by data indicating ~11,000 avoidable deaths in NHS England annually. An investigation conducted by the UK's Times Health Commission in 2023 emphasises the urgency of addressing narcissism within the healthcare system. As the Commission examined the future of health and social care, it uncovered a landscape fraught with challenges such as the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, budget constraints, an A&E crisis, mounting waiting lists, health inequalities, obesity, and the challenges posed by an aging population. The extensive evidence sessions with diverse stakeholders, including senior doctors, nurses, midwives, hospital managers, scientists, business leaders, politicians, and health experts, provided a comprehensive understanding of the issues at play. Narcissists are attracted to healthcare, and narcissism, is identified as a rising concern with suggestions of a potential "narcissism epidemic" in Western economies. The prevalence of narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) in up to ~5% of the US and UK populations is alarming, with important implications for healthcare providers and the delivery of care. Early recognition and mitigation of narcissistic tendencies are critical to safeguard both care providers and patients. In the face of unprecedented challenges within the healthcare sector, recognising and actively addressing narcissism becomes necessary to strengthen the resilience of healthcare delivery. Unveiling the subtle yet impactful consequences of narcissistic tendencies and integrating targeted mitigation strategies into healthcare management are central to our suggestions. This proactive approach not only ensures a more robust operational framework but also paves the way for a patient-centric future, where the wellbeing of individuals takes centre stage in the evolving landscape of healthcare.
 
In this Commentary

This Commentary has three sections. Part 1: Decoding Narcissism, describes the condition, highlights some early warning signs, points to its incidence rates in the US and UK, and draws attention to the impact of narcissism on individuals and relationships. Part 2: Narcissism in Healthcare, discusses the prevalence and challenges of narcissism in healthcare settings, examining its impact on team dynamics, and patient-provider relationships. Part 3: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Narcissism, describes early warning signs and suggests key human resource strategies to alleviate the adverse effects of the disorder and considers some ethical implications of NPD for healthcare delivery. Takeaways emphasise: (i) early recognition of NPD and a proactive approach to its mitigation, (ii) professional help, and (iii) continuous learning and empathy development.  
 
Part 1
Decoding Narcissism
 
In recent years, the spotlight on narcissism has intensified, prompting discussions within the healthcare community. Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD) is a mental health condition characterised by a pervasive pattern of self-importance, a constant need for admiration, and a lack of empathy for others. More specifically, characteristics of the condition include: (i) a grandiose sense of self-importance and an exaggeration of one's talents and achievements, (ii) a preoccupation with fantasies of success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love, (iii) an excessive need for admiration and a constant seeking of validation from others, (iv) a lack of empathy, (v) a sense of entitlement, (vi) a tendency to take advantage of others to achieve personal goals, often without regard for their wellbeing, (vii) a pervasive sense of envy toward others and a belief that others are envious of oneself, and (viii) arrogance.
 
People with the condition often engage in a behaviour referred to as gaslighting. This is a manipulative tactic that makes others doubt their own perceptions, memories, or sanity. Narcissists subtly or overtly distort facts, deny events, or present alternative narratives to undermine the confidence and reality of their victims. This can lead the person being gaslit to question their own judgment and feel confused, ultimately reinforcing the narcissist's control over them. Gaslighting is a harmful behaviour that undermines trust and can have enduring effects on the mental wellbeing of the individual experiencing it. The term gaslighting comes from a 1944 American movie, Gaslight, which is based on a 1938 play by Patrick Hamilton and stars Ingrid Bergman. The movie tells the story of a narcissist that drives his wife insane.
 
It is important to note that while everyone may exhibit some narcissistic traits at times, which are characterised by expressions of pride, egotism, and vanity, it does not mean that a person is a narcissist.  Individuals with the disorder display these traits consistently and to a degree that manifests as antisocial behaviour expressing callousness, remorselessness, and selfishness, with little empathy, and the condition impairs their functioning in various professional and personal aspects of life.

Narcissism casts a significant shadow over the psychological landscape. The condition affects up to ~5% of the American (~17m) and British (~3.4m) populations. The overwhelming majority of people with the disorder are males (~75%). Despite a prevalence among Afro-Americans (~12.5%) and Hispanics (~7.5%), ~87% of diagnosed Americans are Caucasian. However, such disparities could reflect access to therapy and treatment. A demographic breakdown reveals a higher incidence of the condition among young adults aged 20 to 34, with declining rates in those aged ≥50. Challenges in relationships are evidenced in the US statistics, with ~9.6% of narcissists being single, ~7.3% divorced or separated, and ~4.9% married. A higher percentage of narcissism is observed among mental health patients (~6%), forensic analysts (~6%), military personnel (~20%), and first-year medical students (~17%). These trends invite reflection on the socio-cultural factors contributing to the manifestation of narcissistic traits and emphasises the importance of tailored interventions across diverse demographics.

The causes of the disorder are rooted in a complex interplay of inherited traits, distinct personality characteristics, neurobiological influences, and environmental factors, all of which remain elusive. Notably, parent-child relationships marked by excessive adoration or criticism are believed to be contributory factors. The contemporary shift towards individualism, amplified by the omnipresence of social media, is also implicated in the increase of the disorder. A study published in the May 2021 edition of Personality Neuroscience suggests a connection between narcissism and heightened sensitivity to ego threats and emphasises social and emotional processing challenges and alterations in the brain's salience network as factors influencing the interpersonal dynamics of individuals with the condition. As society, organisations, families, and individuals grapple with these shifts, comprehending the ramifications of NPD's rise and impact becomes important. Here we discuss the negative influence of the condition on healthcare.

 
Part 2
Narcissism in Healthcare

In healthcare, the interplay between narcissism and health professionals is a complex and much debated subject. While quantifying the prevalence of narcissistic traits within healthcare institutions is challenging, studies suggest an affinity between narcissists and professions offering authority, recognition, and control: qualities inherent in certain healthcare roles. This proclivity can manifest in behaviours with potential repercussions on workplace dynamics and the delivery of care. John Banja's 2005 publication, Medical Errors and Medical Narcissism, illustrates how healthcare professionals, driven by a need to preserve their self-esteem, might hesitate to acknowledge and disclose medical errors.
 
The manifestation of narcissistic traits in healthcare professionals can divert their focus towards personal recognition, hindering collaboration with colleagues and impeding empathetic connections with patients. Identifying and addressing narcissistic traits in healthcare settings becomes imperative to cultivate a positive and collaborative environment. The inclination of narcissists to prioritise self-promotion over collaboration adds complexity to patient care, where emotional understanding and connection are necessary.
 
NPD casts a shadow on the dynamics between healthcare providers and their patients or collaborators, leaving an indelible mark on the relationships within the healthcare landscape, be it the collaboration and innovation-driven realm of MedTechs or the intricate doctor-patient connections. Healthcare professionals navigating narcissistic traits may find it challenging to comprehend and empathise with the emotions and experiences of colleagues and patients. This difficulty can create a perceived lack of compassion, posing a threat to trustworthy collaborative relationships within healthcare teams and compromising the balance in patient-provider connections.

 
The influence of narcissism on healthcare delivery is multifaceted, creating various disruptions. Providers swayed by narcissistic tendencies may prioritise personal validation over patient-centred care, challenging the importance of focusing on the patient's wellbeing in decision-making processes. Effective communication and empathy, critical elements in healthcare, may become casualties of narcissistic traits, impacting the informed consent process, and necessitating heightened ethical considerations to ensure respectful and informed patient consent. Maintaining appropriate boundaries becomes a struggle, giving rise to ethical concerns related to potential exploitation or invasion of patient privacy.
 
Beyond individual interactions, narcissism can also permeate collaborative efforts and teamwork, with ethical dilemmas emerging when personal interests overshadow collective goals. This compromises patient care and safety as collaboration and synergy take a back seat to self-centred motives. A culture of openness and accountability, vital for addressing concerns and errors in healthcare, faces hindrance, impacting care quality and the ability to rectify issues. Additionally, the prioritisation of personal recognition over equitable resource distribution raises ethical concerns regarding the fair and just use of healthcare resources. Thus, the ripple effect of narcissistic traits extends across a wide range of healthcare relationships and collaborations, demanding a nuanced approach to ensure the wellbeing of both providers and patients.

 
Part 3
Mitigating the Negative Effects of Narcissism

Early intervention plays an important role in addressing NPD and preventing its potentially harmful behaviours. Identifying early signs within oneself requires careful attention to behavioural patterns and interpersonal dynamics. Key indicators include feelings of grandeur, an inflated sense of achievements, and an incessant need for admiration. Additionally, individuals should assess their ability to understand and connect with the emotions and experiences of others, scrutinise their excessive need for praise and validation, and be cognisant of defensiveness or emotional reactions to feedback.
 
Similarly, recognising early signs in colleagues involves observing their interactions with others, noting potential signs such as a lack of genuine connection, self-promotion, and difficulties collaborating. Communication styles, domination in conversations, and reluctance to listen are red flags. Assessing their teamwork, prioritisation of personal goals over team goals, and conflicts with colleagues can provide further insights. Observing consistent patterns over time is important due to the enduring nature of the disorder's traits.
 
It is essential to emphasise that occasional narcissistic traits do not equate to NPD. However, if concerns persist, seeking professional help early enhances the likelihood of positive outcomes. Professional intervention fosters self-awareness and serves as a foundation for positive change. Therapy guides individuals through self-exploration, offering tools to navigate challenges, manage stress, and improve relationships. Early intervention is critical in mitigating the potential harm narcissistic traits can inflict on relationships.
 
Creating a positive work environment involves open communication, clear goals, and team-building activities. Acknowledging and appreciating team efforts, empowering members, embracing diversity, and establishing effective conflict resolution mechanisms contribute to a positive workplace. Leaders play a crucial role by exemplifying positive behaviour and encouraging constructive feedback, promoting collaboration, employee satisfaction, and increased productivity.
  
Addressing NPD in healthcare delivery raises ethical concerns, requiring a focus on patient-centred care, effective communication, professional boundaries, and a collaborative, ethical healthcare culture. Healthcare professionals and organisations must embrace these challenges, guided by ethical principles to ensure quality patient care. Human resources play a crucial role in fostering psychological safety: a culture where team members freely express ideas, admit mistakes, and contribute without fear. This openness supports innovation, risk reduction, and inclusivity, serving as a game-changer for team dynamics and performance. Properly managed, psychological safety leads to fewer mistakes, increased creativity, enhanced team performance, improved diversity, and greater organisational resilience. It is not a luxury but a necessity for thriving teams, encouraging open communication, building trust, and emphasising team dynamics over individual skills.
 
Takeaways

Successfully addressing the challenges posed by NPD requires a comprehensive and proactive strategy. Recognising the early signs and intervening promptly is essential to mitigate the negative impacts on personal relationships, work environments, and healthcare delivery. Seeking professional help, fostering self-awareness, and developing effective coping mechanisms serve as foundational pillars for cultivating healthier interpersonal dynamics. Building resilience against narcissistic challenges necessitates a commitment to continuous learning, empathy development, and the establishment of robust boundaries. Organisations, too, can benefit by promoting awareness, education, and proactive management of narcissism, thereby reducing associated stigma, and fostering open conversations about mental health. Education is a key component, targeting healthcare professionals to recognise early signs of the disorder and understand its impact on individuals, relationships, and healthcare delivery. Proactive management involves creating supportive environments, implementing interventions, and cultivating a culture of empathy and collaboration. Prioritising mental health, advocating for accessible resources, and adopting a compassionate and informed approach can collectively address the challenges associated with NPD, contributing to a more empathetic and understanding society.
view in full page
Directory:
Tags:
Peace, Health and Best Wishes for 2024
 
 
The HealthPad Team would like to wish you and your loved ones a joyful Festive Season and a prosperous and peaceful New Year.

Thanks for your continued support. As we celebrate another year together, we sincerely hope you've found our Commentaries interesting and helpful.

 
In the dynamic landscape of healthcare, 2023 has proven to be a year marked by 18 impactful publications. A trend has emerged, suggesting that many MedTech leaders, after enjoying success, are now managing legacy products in markets with subdued momentum. Confronted by challenges to enhance growth rates and add value, our focus has been to address issues that significantly impact MedTech companies, with an aim to both encourage and contribute to strategic discussions among industry leaders (MedTechs Battle with AI for Sustainable Growth and Enhanced Value, The Silent Obstacle to MedTech Growth and Value Creation, Forging a path for digital excellence in the MedTech Industry, Redefining Leadership in the Evolving Landscape of MedTech, Unleashing MedTech's Competitive Edge through Transformational Technologies, The Financialization Dilemma of MedTechs, Healthcare disrupters, Re-imagining healthcare, The impact of big data, artificial intelligence, and machine learning).

In our explorations, we've delved into women's health (Transforming Women's Health) and celebrated the endeavours of a remarkable woman who won the 2023 Nobel Prize for Physiology or Medicine (A Nobel Journey: Triumph over Adversity, Serendipity, BioNTech’s Rise, and mRNA Marvels).
 
Venturing into the realm of innovation, we've examined emerging technologies and strategies (PPG technology: Unlocking the Potential of Healthcare, The Future of Regenerative Medicine, 3D bioprinting and the advanced wound care market, Out of the hospital into the home). We've also charted new frontiers, questioning if Africa is the next hub for Western MedTechs (Is Africa the New Asia for Western MedTechs?) and speculated on the future landscape of healthcare in 2040 (Healthcare 2040).

We trust these Commentaries have been engaging, offering insights, and encouraging thought. As we bid farewell to 2023, we look forward sharing more thought-provoking content with you in 2024.
view in full page

The HealthPad Team would like to extend our thanks for your continued support. As we celebrate another year together, we sincerely hope you've found our Commentaries interesting and helpful and we look forward sharing more thought-provoking content with you in 2024.

view in full page
  • Since 2000 healthcare has been transformed by genomics, AI, the internet, robotics, and data-driven solutions
  • Traditional providers, anchored in outdated technologies, struggle to keep pace with the evolving healthcare landscape
  • Over the next two decades anticipate another seismic shift, bringing further disruptions to medical technology and healthcare delivery
  • In the face of this imminent transformation, risk-averse leaders may cling to outdated portfolios, showing little interest in adapting to a 2040 healthcare ecosystem
  • Providers must decide; embrace change now and thrive in a transformed healthcare landscape, or stick to the status quo and risk losing value and competitiveness
 
Healthcare 2040
 
Abstract

By 2040, the landscape of healthcare will have undergone a seismic shift, discarding antiquated models in favour of cutting-edge AI-genomic-data-driven approaches that will radically change both medical technology and healthcare delivery. This transformation signifies a departure from the conventional one-size-fits-all system, ushering in an era of targeted therapies grounded in molecular-level insights that challenge entrenched healthcare paradigms. The evolving healthcare narrative emphasises prevention, wellbeing, personalised care, and heightened accessibility. This departure from the norm is not a trend but a significant reconfiguration, where the fusion of biomedical science, technology, and expansive datasets merge to facilitate early detection and proactive interventions. This not only deepens our comprehension of diseases but also elevates the efficacy of therapies. At the core of this transformation is the empowerment of individuals within a framework that champions choice and fosters virtual communities. Genetic advancements, far from just addressing hereditary conditions, play an important role in enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimising patient outcomes, and fundamentally shifting the focus from reactive diagnosis and treatment to a proactive commitment to prevention and holistic wellbeing. The indispensable roles played by genomics and AI-driven care in reshaping healthcare are not isolated occurrences; they will catalyse the emergence of new data-intensive R&D enterprises, which are poised to redefine the healthcare landscape against a backdrop of multifaceted influencing factors. Successfully navigating this transformative period necessitates a distinct set of capabilities and strategic alignment with an envisioned 2040 healthcare environment.

Providers find themselves at a crossroads, confronted with a choice: adapt and thrive or risk losing value and competitiveness in a rapidly evolving landscape. Recognising potential resistance to change and the scarcity of pertinent capabilities, leaders of traditional enterprises must acknowledge that immediate strategic action is not just beneficial but a prerequisite for success in the redefined healthcare ecosystem of 2040. The urgency of this call to action cannot be overstated, as the window of opportunity for adaptation narrows with each passing moment.

 
In this Commentary

This Commentary aims to help healthcare professionals to strategically reposition their organizations for success in the next two decades. Leaders must evaluate their strengths and weaknesses in the context of an envisioned future and implement strategies to align their organisations with the demands of a rapidly changing health ecosystem. Failure to do so will dent enterprises’ competitiveness and threaten their survival. Leaders should anticipate and address resistance to change among executives with a preference for the status quo. The Commentary has two sections: Part 1, Looking Back 20 Years, describes the scale and pace of change since 2000 and emphasises how genomics, the internet, AI, digitalization, data-driven solutions, robotics, telehealth, outpatient services, personalised care, ubiquitous communications, and strategic responses to demographic shifts have transformed medical technology and healthcare delivery. Part 2, Looking Forward 20 Years, seeks to stimulate discussions about the future of healthcare. While we highlight a range of factors positioned to impact medical technology and healthcare deliver in the future, we emphasise the significance of genomics, varied and vast datasets, and AI. We suggest the emergence of specialised agile, AI-driven research boutiques with capabilities to leverage untapped genomic, personal, and medical data. The proliferation of such entities will oblige traditional healthcare enterprises to reduce their R&D activities and concentrate on manufacturing. Over the next 20 years, anticipate an accelerated shift towards patient-centric, cell-based prevention and wellbeing care modalities, large hospitals replaced with smaller hubs of medical excellence, the rapid growth of outpatient centres, and the acceleration of home care and care-enabled virtual communities. The future dynamic healthcare ecosystem necessitates stakeholders to change immediately if they are to survive and prosper. Takeaways posit a choice for healthcare leaders: either stick to the status quo and risk losing value and competitiveness or embrace change and stay relevant.
 
Part 1
 
Looking Back 20 Years

Reflecting on the past two decades shows the rapid evolution and interplay of factors shaping medical technology and healthcare delivery. Appreciating the speed and scale of change helps to envision the future. Factors such as genomics, the Internet, AI, robotics, digitalisation, data-driven health solutions, telehealth, outpatient services, home care, personalised wellbeing, ubiquitous personal telephony, and strategic responses to demographic shifts have all influenced medical technology and healthcare delivery and will continue to do so in the future. Here we describe a few of these factors.

The completion of the Human Genome Project in 2003 was a pivotal moment in the direction of medical advancement, laying the foundations for the emergence of genomics. Genomics, encapsulating the mapping, sequencing, and analysis of DNA, is a pivotal tool for unravelling molecular information, variations, and their implications in both traits and diseases. This achievement not only transformed biomedical research but also changed healthcare, shifting it from a generic one-size-fits-all approach to finely tuned care tailored to the unique genetic makeup of individuals.

Over the past two decades, the decoding of the human genetic blueprint has provided unprecedented insights into diseases at the molecular level, triggering a paradigm shift in medicine. This ushered in an era of personalised and precision approaches to diagnoses, treatments, and prevention. From the advent of targeted therapies to the implementation of genetic screening, genomic research has had a transformative influence and is positioned to continue its impact on healthcare.

Indeed, genomic testing has become a standard practice, and US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved genomic care modalities have advanced medicine. For example, pharmacogenonics tailors drug treatments to individual patients by utilising genetic information, with FDA-approved tests for specific biomarkers that predict medication responses. Hereditary assessments evaluate an individual's cancer risk based on genetic makeup, such as identifying BRCA gene mutations linked to elevated risks of breast and ovarian cancers. Gene expression profiling analyses a patient's tumour genetics to guide targeted cancer therapies, with FDA-approved companion diagnostic tests for specific cancer treatments. Carrier testing identifies genetic mutations that could be passed on to children, which contribute to family planning and prenatal care. Pharmacodiagnostic tests help pinpoint patients that would benefit from specific drug treatments, predicting responses, especially in cancer therapies.

In 2012, the UK government inaugurated Genomics England, an initiative designed to spearhead the 100,000 Genomes Project, which aimed to sequence the genomes of 100,000 patients with infectious diseases and specific cancers. The project’s goals included the enhancement of our understanding of various genetic factors in diseases, the facilitation of targeted treatments and establishing a framework for the integration of genomics into everyday clinical practice. The successful completion of the project in 2018, provided a basis for genomic medicine and a deeper understanding of the genetic framework influencing health and disease.

In addition to genomic data, since 2000, there has been a significant increase in health-related data, driven by the proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs), developments in information management technologies, initiatives to improve healthcare efficiency, and enhanced communications among stakeholders. The growth in data has, in turn, created opportunities for the utilisation of AI and machine learning (ML) algorithms. Over the last two decades, AI has changed medical technology and healthcare delivery by enhancing diagnostics, personalising treatment plans, streamlining administrative tasks, and facilitating research through efficient data analysis, which has improved patient outcomes, and advanced the field. As of January 2023, the FDA has approved >520 AI and ML algorithms for medical use, which are primarily related to the analysis of medical images and videos. Indeed, the rise of algorithms has transformed healthcare, with many of them focusing on predictions using EHRs that do not require FDA approval.

In addition to EHRs there has been the evolution of wearable technologies like the Apple Watch and Fitbit, which have transformed personal health. Initially focusing on fitness tracking, these devices have expanded to monitor an array of health metrics. Over the years, they have amassed vast amounts of personalised data, ranging from activity levels to heart rate patterns. These data reservoirs are a goldmine for healthcare and wellbeing strategies, enabling individuals, healthcare professionals and providers to gain unprecedented insights into health trends, customised care routines, and the early detection of health issues. This combination of technology and health data has created opportunities for proactive healthcare management and personalised wellbeing interventions.

Targeted medicine not only benefitted from AI but also from personalised telephony, which experienced a significant boost in the early 2000s by the widespread internet access in households across the globe. The period was marked by the introduction of the iPad in 2001, closely followed by the launch of the iPhone. These innovations triggered widespread smartphone use and accessible internet connectivity, laying the foundations for the emergence of telehealth and telemedicine. In the early 2000s, global cell phone subscriptions numbered ~740m. Today, the figure is >8bn, surpassing the world's population. This increase was driven by the proliferation of broadband, the evolution of mobile technologies and the rise of social media, all contributing to the ubiquitous presence of the internet. By the 2010s, the internet had integrated into the daily lives of a substantial portion of the global population. Initially, in 2000, ~7% of the world’s population had access online. Contrastingly, today, >50% enjoy internet connectivity. In a similar vein, broadband access in American homes has surged from ~50% in 2000 to >90% in the present day. Personal telephony has evolved into an omnipresent force, and has become an integral part of billions of lives, actively enhancing health and wellbeing on a global scale. After 2010, patient-centric wellbeing evolved and later was helped by Covid-19 pandemic lockdowns, with telehealth and telemedicine offering remote consultations and treatments, empowering patients, and emphasising shared decision-making between healthcare providers and patients.

On a more prosaic level, consider how robotics has changed surgery over the past two decades by offering enhanced precision, reduced invasiveness, and improved recovery times. The use of robotic systems, like the da Vinci Surgical System, which gained FDA-approval in 2000, has allowed surgeons to perform complex procedures with greater accuracy. Between 2012 and 2022, the percentage of surgical procedures using robotic systems rose from 1.8% to 17%. Robotic surgery is becoming increasingly popular, with an annual growth rate of ~15%. In 2020, its global volume was 1.24m, with the US accounting for >70% of all robotic surgeries.

The shifting demographics over the past few decades, marked by decreasing birth rates, prolonged life expectancy, and immigration, has transformed prosperous industrial economies, resulting in a substantial rise in the proportion of the elderly population. For instance, in the US in 2000, there were ~35m citizens ≥65; today, this figure has risen to ~56m, ~17% of the population. Concurrently, there has been an increase of chronic lifetime illnesses such as heart disease, diabetes, cancer, and respiratory disorders. In 2000, ~125m Americans suffered from at least one chronic condition. Today, this figure has increased to ~133m - ~50% of the population. Simultaneously, there is a shrinking pool of health professionals. Research suggests that by 2030, there will be ~5m fewer physicians than society will require. This, together with ageing populations, the growing burden of chronic diseases and rising costs of healthcare globally are challenging governments, payers, regulators, and providers to innovate and transform medical technology and healthcare delivery.

 
Part 2
 
Looking Forward 20 Years

This section aims to encourage healthcare professionals to envision the future. Over the next two decades, medical technology and healthcare delivery are likely to be affected by numerous interconnected factors, which include: (i) continued progress in AI and ML, internet of things (IoT), robotics, nanotechnology, and biotechnology, (ii) advances in genomics, (iii) increasing availability of multi-modal data (genomics, economic, demographic, clinical and phenotypic) coupled with technology innovations, (iv) accelerated adoption of telemedicine and virtual monitoring technologies, (v) changes in healthcare regulations, (vi) an increase of patient-cantered care and greater patient involvement in decision-making, (vii) emerging infectious diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and other global health issues, (viii) Investments in healthcare infrastructure, both physical and digital, (ix) an evolving and shrinking healthcare workforce, including the further integration of AI technologies and changes in roles, (x) economic conditions and healthcare funding, (xi) the ethical use of technology, privacy concerns, and societal attitudes towards healthcare innovations, and (xii) environmental changes and their impact on health and wellbeing. Such factors and their interconnectivity are expected to drive significant healthcare transformation over the next two decades. Healthcare systems throughout the world are tasked with: (i) improving population health, (ii) enhancing patients’ therapeutic journeys and outcomes, (iii) strengthening caregivers’ experience and (iv) reducing the rising cost of care. There appears to be unanimous agreement among healthcare leaders that these goals will not be achieved by business as usual.
 
In November 2023, BTIG, a leading global financial services firm, organised its Digital Health Forum, bringing together >30 healthcare companies that offer a diverse range of products and services. During the event, executives discussed business models, reimbursement, and commercial strategies, and unanimously agreed that: "The market is primed for the mainstream integration of digital diagnostics and therapeutics."  Here we focus on the anticipated accelerated convergence of genomics and AI technologies, and foresee the emergence of agile, AI-driven R&D boutiques as key players in reshaping medical technology and healthcare delivery.
 
These dynamic research entities thrive on the power of data. Currently, ~79% of the hospital data generated annually goes untapped, and medical information is doubling every 73 days. This emphasises the vast latent potential within these repositories. Traditional enterprises and healthcare professionals, constrained by a dearth of data management capabilities, have struggled to unlock the full potential inherent in these vast stores of information. By contrast, the adept data processing capabilities of these new innovative enterprises position them strategically to harness untapped data sources, extracting valuable insights into disease states and refining treatment modalities. Moreover, they boast advanced technology stacks, seamless connections between semiconductors, software, and systems, and are well-prepared to leverage specialised generative AI applications as they emerge in the market. Armed with cutting-edge technology and extensive datasets, they stand ready to enhance diagnostic precision, streamline treatment approaches, and reduce overall healthcare costs. Private equity firms will be eager to invest in these disruptive AI start-ups, anticipating M&A activities focused on specific therapeutic areas that will make them appealing to public markets.

These innovative entities are set to expedite the introduction of disruptive solutions, improve patients' therapeutic journeys, and optimise outcomes while driving operational efficiencies. Anticipate them to overshadow their traditional counterparts, many of which have outdated legacy offerings and historically have treated R&D as small adjustments to existing portfolios. Given that many conventional healthcare enterprises have: (i) failed to keep pace with technological developments, (ii) a dearth of in-house data-handling capabilities, and (iii) no experience in data-heavy disruptive R&D, it seems reasonable to suggest that they will most likely retreat into their core manufacturing activities, relinquish their R&D roles and lose value.

In the forefront of seismic change, the integration of digitalisation, AI, and cutting-edge decision support tools propels the emerging agile, data-driven R&D enterprises into a pivotal role within the landscape of well-informed, personalised healthcare. Meticulously safeguarding sensitive information, these enterprises not only adhere to the highest standards of privacy but also elevate security measures through state-of-the-art encryption techniques and decentralised storage solutions. As staunch guardians of privacy, they go beyond conventional approaches, crafting data repositories that not only shield confidential information but also facilitate the seamless flow of critical insights crucial for advancing medical technology and elevating care delivery. The seamless synergy between vast genomic, economic, demographic, clinical, and phenotypic data repositories and advanced AI techniques is poised to radically change healthcare R&D, redirecting it away from refining traditional products towards disruptive endeavours. Moreover, these agile research entities are anticipated to encourage widespread industry cooperation, harnessing the power of diverse data sources to innovate health solutions and services that transcend boundaries, thereby playing an important role in shaping a borderless health and wellbeing ecosystem.

In the regulatory arena, a transformation is anticipated by 2040. Regulators are likely to evolve from enforcers to stewards of progress, collaborating with industry stakeholders to promote a consumer-centric healthcare. Advocating transparency, patients' rights, and ethical innovation, regulators will become influential drivers of progress, contributing to a shared and equitable healthcare future. This collaborative effort is expected to contribute to a data-driven healthcare ecosystem that prioritises individual wellbeing, innovation, and accessibility in equal measure.

By 2040, expect healthcare payers to have undergone a transformative change, fuelled by a seismic shift in medical technology and healthcare delivery. New payment models will prioritise individualised therapies and patient outcomes, leveraging real-time health data for customised coverage. AI will streamline administration, reduce costs, and enhance overall healthcare efficiency. Increased patient engagement and collaboration among payers, providers, and patients will drive a holistic, patient-centred approach, ultimately improving the quality and accessibility of healthcare services.


This section has emphasised the transformative forces of genomics and AI shaping a personalised healthcare ecosystem. While traditional medical technology and healthcare delivery may be predicated upon physical devices and a one-size-fits-all approach, the future lies in the fusion of data and smart software to accelerate targeted care, which marks a significant departure from the conventional.
 
Takeaways

The shift towards genomic-driven healthcare marks a transformation in the medical landscape expected by 2040. Moving away from outdated models, the trend towards personalised care, rooted in molecular insights, necessitates a revaluation from health professionals. This shift, facilitated by the fusion of biomedical science, advanced technologies, and vast amounts of varied data, foresees a future where prevention, individualised wellbeing, and improved accessibility become the new norm. The convergence of genomics and AI not only improves diagnostics and treatments but also points to prevention and overall wellness. This Commentary has highlighted the transformative impact of genomics and AI-driven healthcare at the cellular level, making way for data-intensive R&D enterprises that will shape the future of medical technology and healthcare delivery. The path to 2040 demands a departure from conventional norms of the past, requiring strategic realignment and specific capabilities. Traditional providers find themselves at a juncture: those that adapt to an envisioned care environment of 2040 are more likely to succeed, while those that resist risk becoming obsolete. By acknowledging potential obstacles to change and the scarcity of relevant capabilities, leaders are encouraged to recognise the urgency of strategic action as a prerequisite for success in the redefined healthcare landscape of 2040. The future is imminent, and the time for transformative readiness is now.
view in full page