Tag

Tagged: cancer research

Sponsored
joined 10 years, 6 months ago

Robert Brown

Chair Translational Oncology and Head of Division of Cancer, Imperial College London

Professor Robert Brown is Chair in Translational Oncology and Head of Division of Cancer within the Department of Surgery and Cancer at Imperial College, where he heads the Epigenetics Unit. His post is a joint appointment between Imperial College London and Institute of Cancer Research where he is the Epigenetics Team Leader in the Section of Molecular Pathology. Bob is Principal Investigator of a Cancer Research UK research programme, Drug Resistance and Epigenetic Mechanisms, and is a joint Principle Investigator of the Imperial Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. He moved to London in 2007 after working for nearly 20 years at the CRUK Beatson Laboratories in Glasgow where he was Director of Laboratory Research in the Centre for Oncology and Applied Pharmacology. He obtained his BSc in Biological Sciences (Genetics) at Edinburgh University, his PhD at MRC Radiobiology Unit, Harwell, and his Post-doc at the German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg.

He has provided key insight into epigenetic mechanisms involved in tumorigenesis and resistance to chemotherapy, particularly in ovarian cancer. Recent areas of his research include; identifying novel epigenetic targets in ovarian and breast cancer, characterising histone marks and DNA methylation in breast and ovarian tumours as risk, prognostic and/or predictive biomarkers, and development of novel histone methyltransferase inhibitors.

He is Chair of the NCRI Biomarker and Imaging Clinical Studies Group whose remit is to facilitate and support biomarker and imaging studies in UK clinical trials. He is Deputy-Chair of CR-UK New Agents Committee and member of MRC Molecular and Cellular Medicine Board.


view this profile
joined 10 years, 7 months ago

Elena Ioana Braicu

Senior gynaecologist

Elena Ioana Braicu is a senior gynecologist at the Department for Gynecology Campus Vrchow, Charité Medical University Berlin. She is leading the translational research within this department, and coordinating the Tumor Bank for Ovarian Cancer network (www.toc-network.de).

She qualified in medicine in 2003 from “Iuliu Hatieganu” Medical University in Cluj-Napoca, Romania. She was research fellow at Max Delbrück Research center Berlin in 2003 and 2004, than at the Charité from 2005 and 2006 and at the University of Basel in 2008. Since 2009 she is working at the European Competence Center for Ovarian Cancer at the Charité Medical University.


She is representing the translational group of NOGGO, north eastern German society for gynecological oncology within ENGOT. She is a founding EUTROC member and is leading the working group for biobanking. She is also consultant for pediatric gynecology at the Charité Medical University.


Dr. Braicu participated in several European projects, like OVCAD (www.ovcad.eu) and OCTIPS (www.octips.eu). She is work package leader for biobanking and data repository in the Fp7 European Phase I/II clinical study, Gannet53 (www.gannet53.eu).


She is member in several national and international study groups (e.g. AGO, NOGGO, TOC, ENGOT, EUTROC, GCIG). She is member of the German Foundation of Ovarian Cancer.


Furthermore she is participating in several Phase I to Phase III clinical study as sub-investigator. She is the vice-coordinator of the clinical trial study center at the Charité Medical University.

Since 2013, she is a fellow of the clinical scientist program of the Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the Berlin Institute of Health.


Her main interests are prevention and diagnostic of pelvic tumors in general and high risk population. She is focusing also in the discovery of predictive biomarkers for clinical outcome in ovarian cancer patients.

 


view this profile
joined 10 years, 7 months ago

EUTROC

European Translational Research network in Ovarian Cancer

EUTROC (European Translational Research network in Ovarian Cancer) is a European cancer network addressing the fragmentation currently hindering translational research for cutting edge therapies in ovarian cancer.

It will strengthen European excellence in the diagnosis and treatment of OC.

The need to bring promising drug candidates and treatments into clinical settings is currently delayed by the lack of standardised protocols for preclinical animal studies, lack of suitable ovarian cancer models, lack of validated predictive biomarker diagnostics, and integrated appropriate management of translational research partners (including pharma and biotech companies).

Developing effective diagnostic and treatment strategies require structured joint efforts of experts on tumor immunology, epigenetics, pathology, bioinformatics, drug development and delivery, trial development, clinical oncology and gynecological oncology.

Leading European researchers and clinicians together with the pharmaceutical industry and biotech companies will focus on preclinical and clinical studies in ovarian cancer. Therefore new targets will be identified, validated and translated to new drugs and brought to clinical practice. Standardisation and harmonisation of laboratory practices and good clinical practice procedures will BE performed within the consortium.

The consortium combines expertise in clinical as well as preclinical research. Involved researchers are coordinating a number of investigator-initiated Phase I, II trials.The Network will build a platform for research and strong educational programs for the next generation of experts aimed at developing individualised patients benefit.


view this profile
joined 10 years, 10 months ago

Ovarian Cancer Action is the UK’s leading ovarian cancer charity. Its focus is to improve the prognosis of all women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. It aims to transform ovarian cancer treatment and improve survival through creating a research environment that encourages scientific breakthrough; this is why it is vital to establish and continue to fund the UK’s first research centre dedicated solely to ovarian cancer.

OCA's passion is to reach every woman and GP in the UK with key messages about ovarian cancer and its symptoms. This, we feel, will contribute to ensuring that a greater proportion of women are diagnosed as early as possible giving women a greater chance of survival.


view this profile
 
Is the communications guru, Maurice Saatchi right in thinking that the law is an obstacle to finding a cure for ovarian cancer?
 
There’s a bigger and more substantial obstacle: poor communications.
 
Saatchi might consider using his abilities, honed in building global advertising agencies, to improve ways scientists and doctors communicate and share clinical data and tumour samples in their endeavours to find a cure for ovarian cancer.  
 
Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill
In 2012 Saatchi introduced a private member’s bill to the UK’s Parliament, “to show that scientific progress has been stopped by law” and to encourage new therapies by legalizing the ability of doctors to use experimental treatments even if there is no proof they work. 
 
In 2011, Saatchi’s wife, the novelist Josephine Hart, died of ovarian cancer. He described her treatment as, "medieval, degrading and ineffective.” Doctors, he said, aren’t receptive to new and innovative therapies and don’t move away from the tried and tested, but unsuccessful treatments they know.
 
Speaking of his wife, he said, “She would have had the same procedure anywhere in the world: same drugs, same operation, same everything.” Saatchi’s Medical Innovation Bill is designed to change this by liberating doctors from generally accepted medical protocols and encouraging them to innovate.
 
Rarely in the UK does a private member’s bill become law, but Saatchi has triggered an important debate.  
Some Facts
Ovarian cancer is an age related silent killer of women. There is no effective early detection method for the disease and therefore it’s mostly diagnosed in advance stages. It accounts for five per cent of all cancer deaths among women. The average age for the onset of the disease is 63.
 
Each year, more than 204,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer worldwide. About half die within three years of being diagnosed, partly because so few drugs exist to stop the cancer metastasising and no new treatment has been introduced for more than a decade.
 
Ovarian cancer and commercial interests
Despite being the most frequent cause of cancer related death from gynaecologic malignancies, ovarian cancer does not attract the same level of R&D interest from pharmaceutical companies as some other cancers. This is because pharmaceutical companies create value for their shareholders by concentrating their research resources on the discovery and development of patented blockbuster drugs that are expected to dominate the largest disease states for the duration of their patents.
 
As a result, smaller disease states, such as ovarian cancer, suffer from a relative lack of pharma-backed research resources. As a consequence, ovarian cancers’ mortality rates remain high, detection rates remain low and treatment options do not improve.
 
Obstacle to change
Saatchi has a point about English law. In 1957 an English High Court judge ruled that doctors must act in accordance with, “what the majority of doctors do, even if there are opposing medical views.” This ruling set a precedent for medical negligence cases and is reinforced by the world’s largest professional body for oncologists: the American Society of Clinical Oncology, which promotes evidence based treatment protocols for all cancers to its 30,000 plus members.   

Supporters & detractors
Saatchi’s Bill has its supporters. Lord Howe, the Minister of Health, believes that UK approvals for new treatments are “unacceptable” slow. "It takes an average of 17 years for only 14% of new scientific discoveries to enter day-to-day clinical practice," he said.
 
The Bill also has its detractors. Professor Karol Sikora, a leading authority on cancer and a director of CancerPartners UK, believes Saatchi’s proposal is unnecessary. "If a doctor wants to do something different and the patient consents, doctors can do wacky things," says Sikora, citing the alternative medicine industry, where there is little evidence to suggest that treatments work.
Targeted therapies
The science that underlies cancer therapies has changed from chemistry to genetics. Chemistry fuelled the growth of the pharmaceutical industry in the early to mid 20th century, which has now matured. In the late 20th century genetics gave birth to a new biopharmaceutical industry, which is growing rapidly.
 
Biopharmaceuticals, based on genetics and molecular science have given rise to targeted therapies and personalised medicine. This tailors medical decisions, practices and therapies to individual patients and corrects abnormalities at a molecular level. Such therapies offer the potential to reduce cancer’s unacceptably high mortality rates and raise its unacceptably low detection rates.
 
Several targeted therapies have been approved. The most well known is trastuzumab, which is marketed as Herceptin and used in early stage breast cancer patients with high levels of the HER2 protein.
 
Improved global communications and a cure for ovarian cancer
Targeted therapies require significant data flows between scientists and doctors: the bench-to-bedside approach.  Currently, at best, this is inefficient and at worse, it’s simply not done.
 
Breakthroughs in ovarian cancer research will not occur without significantly improving:
 
1. The collection and standardization of vast clinical data sets from different geographies
2. The creation and development of large-scale interconnected tumor banks with standardized tissue samples also from different geographies
3. The management and distribution of these vast clinical data sets and tumor samples to scientists able to combine genomic and clinical data, which is a necessary prerequisite for genetic, epigenetic and proteomic analysis.
 
Ovarian cancer breakthroughs will not come from professional cancer associations, nor from the endeavors of small charities and nor from doctors alone. All are inexperienced in global communications and big data management. Breakthroughs are more likely when well-resourced global organizations with highly developed big-data management skills get involved in medical research.
 
In September 2013 we came a step closer to this, when Google co-founder and CEO Larry Page announced that he is planning to launch Calico, a new company to use Google’s data-processing strength to shed new light on age-related maladies.
 
In a similar vein, Jonathan Milner the biotech millionaire and a founder of Abcam, one of the world’s largest retailers of research antibodies, is backing a venture to create a Wikipedia of genetic disease data to help diagnose an array of uncured conditions.   
 
Key takeaway
Maurice Saatchi should consider trading his ermine robes for shorts and T-shirt and head to Mountain View, California and combine his considerable communications skills and energies with those of Larry Page in an endeavour to, change the ways medical scientist create, share, communicate, collaborate and do research.”   

 

view in full page